Re: Should tiny utilities be prepackaged?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Should tiny utilities be prepackaged?
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:53:32 +0200
2016年03月02日 13:37 GMT+02:00 steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com>:
> Microlight was an attempt by Jay, Dirk and myself to create something
> small yet useful, as a reaction against kitchen-sink libraries. The
> idea was 'the most useful hundred functions'. Very hard to agree on
> that ;)
I find it quite useful, not often as `require'ml'`, but mostly
by displaying it read-only in a window from which I can
cut-paste-and-modify code. E.g. just the other day I did
that to "ml.keys", but the application needed to exclude
keys that match "%W". I find it more appropriate to adapt
the code, changing the name, than to add complicated
little-used features to the original.