Re: Bitwise confusion?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Bitwise confusion?
- From: <tonyp@...>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:13:50 +0200
And for those who are more Pascal oriented (i.e., not equal is <> which I
personally find more logical than !=), the case '<' can be changed to:
case '<': {
next(ls);
if (check_next1(ls, '=')) return TK_LE;
else if (check_next1(ls, '<')) return TK_SHL;
else if (check_next1(ls, '>')) return TK_NE;
else return '<';
}
-----Original Message-----
From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 3:13 AM
To: Lua mailing list
Subject: Re: Bitwise confusion?
OK, fair enough. I may look into tweaking the parser to accept != as
well as ~= for my own use, though that depends on whether I can wrap
my brain around the parser.
It's the lexer that needs to be hacked and it's pretty easy;
just add this in function llex near to "case '~'":
case '!': {
next(ls);
if (check_next1(ls, '=')) return TK_NE;
else return '!';
}