Why re at all, not straight LPeg?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Why re at all, not straight LPeg?
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:14:36 +0200
2015年08月03日 5:12 GMT+02:00 Sean Conner <sean@conman.org>:
> It doesn't have to use re, it can be in straight lpeg.
I've always thought of the re module as a demo application: see here,
this is how one should build a large, complex LPeg program.
You seem to prefer re and fall back to straight LPeg as a last resort.
Should I invest some time getting to grips with the idiolectic syntax
expected by re.compile, or is that recommended only for those who
already know and love several other regexes?