Re: _ENV vs _G
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: _ENV vs _G
- From: Geoff Leyland <geoff_leyland@...>
- Date: 2014年8月12日 07:18:20 +1200
On 12/08/2014, at 7:13 am, Mason Mackaman <masondeanm@aol.com> wrote:
> Okay, I’ve figured out the relationship between _G and _ENV, _ENV=_G. The reason things were confusing me before is I had forgotten that _G is really _ENV._G, so that clears that up. But now the other part of my question is even bigger, What the hell is the point of _G?
I thought it was a leftover from 5.1 that just hadn’t been removed yet