Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: 2014年5月20日 08:52:37 -0300
> It seems that plain MinGW doesn't have `rm` or `install` executables
> (or a `mkdir` that understands `-p`), so you really have to work hard
> to make the install target work for MinGW ...
We haven't got any complaints about this but perhaps we should just
remove the mingw target and avoid noise?
- References:
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Dirk Laurie
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Ulrich Schmidt
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda