Re: [Challenge] Smallest table copy
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [Challenge] Smallest table copy
- From: Daniel Stephens <daniel@...>
- Date: 2014年5月07日 11:55:51 -0700
On 5/7/14, 11:12 AM, Thiago L. wrote:
#"table" = 5
#"_G[n]" = 5
Really? (I also think the former may be faster, and more readable)
Doh! That's what I get for measuring the impact of several changes at
once -- I totally agree without a saving the _G thing is worthless.
Putting all the call work into the assigment expression is a nice
compaction too.