Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua)
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: 2014年3月17日 15:21:24 +0200
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:12 PM, David Crayford <dcrayford@gmail.com> wrote:
> Slickedit tag files for Lua handle packages with an interface keyword, so
> the os package is defined like so (which give context assist).
That's cool - I was misled by the meaning of the word 'tags'. These
are like the .api files of SciTE.
> IIRC, it's possible to annoate arguments with @format etc. Can LDoc be used
> to generate a table of function/arguments to generate such a structure?
Most definitely. You may have to look at the raw internal
representation (read the end of the manual ;))
(This has been an extremely tame war, and nobody has been religious at all!)
- References:
- C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), Dirk Laurie
- Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), Coda Highland
- Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), steve donovan
- Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), Benjamin Heath
- Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), steve donovan
- Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), Jeremy Ong
- Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), Sean Conner
- Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), steve donovan
- Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), David Crayford
- Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), steve donovan
- Re: C++ religious war (was: llua Higher-level C API for Lua), David Crayford