Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?
• From: Zé <jose.passes@...>
• Date: 2013年3月08日 21:24:03 +0000

---

On 03/08/2013 08:43 PM, Craig Barnes wrote:

I guess the authors of GNU Make missed the point too then, since
recent versions of Make have support for embedded Guile.

You mean the people now working on GNU make? Yes.

---

• References:
  • Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Spencer Parkin
  • Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, steve donovan
  • Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Miles Bader
  • Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Zé
  • Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, William Ahern
  • Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Zé
  • Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Craig Barnes

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?
• Next by Date: Re: Lua library bank? (Was: Ruby philosophy vs Lua philosophy
• Previous by thread: Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?
• Next by thread: Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread