Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?

Subject: Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?
From: Zé <jose.passes@...>
Date: 2013年3月08日 19:34:49 +0000

On 03/08/2013 07:16 PM, Joshua Jensen wrote:

System headers can easily change with an update to GCC or Visual Studio
or whatever.

...which changes once in a blue moon. Which means geological time.

But when it does change, the user only needs to run make clean && make.This isn't rocket surgery.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Joshua Jensen
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, martinwguy

References:
- Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Spencer Parkin
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, steve donovan
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Sean Conner
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Joshua Jensen
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Zé
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Joshua Jensen