Re: Microlight
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Microlight
- From: Geoff Leyland <geoff_leyland@...>
- Date: 2012年12月20日 07:31:19 +1300
On 20/12/2012, at 6:56 AM, steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> e.g. use numerical for instead of for/ipairs
Do you have any data to back up this widely believed fact?
Try this test [1], or your own, better, test.
As far as I can tell, if you're using PUC Lua, then yes, a numeric for is faster than ipairs, but a while loop is even better. If you care about performance, you're probably using LuaJIT, and the loop structure doesn't make any difference.
Cheers,
Geoff
[1] https://gist.github.com/2927017