Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript
• From: Mike Pall <mikelu-1102@...>
• Date: 2011年2月16日 22:21:32 +0100

---

Geoff Leyland wrote:
> Right. Would the ffi help if it was using tables (or ffi
> structures) instead of local variables for x,y and z?
Nope, same issue with allocations that need analysis before being
able to eliminate or sink them.
--Mike

---

• References:
  • LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript, Mike Pall
  • Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript, GrayFace
  • Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript, Mike Pall
  • Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript, Geoff Leyland
  • Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript, Mike Pall
  • Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript, Geoff Leyland

• Prev by Date: Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript
• Next by Date: Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching
• Previous by thread: Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript
• Next by thread: Re: LuaJIT2 vs. JavaScript
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread