Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: 2011年2月16日 19:59:13 +0200
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> When steve donovan proposed a "const" keyword earlier today, I wondered if
> LuaJIT was able to spot that a local is only assigned to once so it could
> automatically treat it as const.
It would be more in the spirit of Lua (that abused term) if the
constness of a value could be deduced from its usage like this.
steve d.
- References:
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Florian Weimer
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, T T
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Daurnimator
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Tony Finch