Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011
• From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
• Date: 2011年1月25日 15:44:50 +0200

---

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote:
> (After discussion:) So, no more need for patched Lua, right?
I'd say so. Once you see it as a dynamic run-time problem, then error
messages are straightforward.
Now, if you wanted to _debug_ the result ... ;)
steve d.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Alexander Gladysh

• References:
  • [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, dcharno
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Petri Häkkinen
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Michal Kottman
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, David Given
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, David Given
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Alexander Gladysh

• Prev by Date: Re: I'd give my right arm for a continue statement
• Next by Date: Re: Newbie question list: Was The perverse vibe of lua-l
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011
• Next by thread: Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread