Re: Is there any plan to include build-in class support?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Is there any plan to include build-in class support?
- From: Steve Litt <slitt@...>
- Date: 2011年1月12日 04:37:36 -0500
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 04:03:17 steve donovan wrote:
> [1] and sure, there are schemes which allow obj.method(args), no
> colon. But you pay a double price; they are not as efficient and they
> will confuse everybody else.
ROFLMAO! I wrote the entirety of the Lua version of UMENU and the Lua EMDL to
UMENU converter using obj.method(args). I don't know anything about
efficiency, but I found it useful that things aborted instantly when I used
the wrong method name. It seemed very clean to me.
You bring up a good point -- I'll have to have a comment at the top explaining
why it's obj.method(args) instead of either obj:method(args) or
obj.method(obj, args).
So I guess I abused closures, huh? :-)
Thanks
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt