Re: bit.lshift and performance - luabitop v.s. lua-5.2.0-work4
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: bit.lshift and performance - luabitop v.s. lua-5.2.0-work4
- From: Mike Pall <mikelu-1010@...>
- Date: 2010年10月13日 16:15:41 +0200
KHMan wrote:
> A few hundred million ops per second doing them on Lua seemed far
> off enough that it seemed to me like a reasonable future target, but
> not something that can be currently done.
$ time luajit -e "for i=1,1e9 do end"
0.340
This means it performs THREE BILLION loop iterations per second.
Welcome to the 21st century! Time to readjust your perceptions. :-)
--Mike