Re: a new proposal for environments
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: a new proposal for environments
- From: David Given <dg@...>
- Date: 2010年2月25日 15:48:31 +0000
On 2010年02月25日 13:51, Jim Whitehead II wrote:
[...]
Indeed, and you'd have the power to do either!
It's always a good sign when you can remove a feature *and make the
language more powerful at the same time*. I like this.
With regard to _G vs _ENV: my understanding is that _G is the
conventional name for the outermost environment, right? And normally
_ENV == _G, except when explicitly overridden?
Is this a useful distinction to keep? After all, overriding the
environment is effectively replacing the global table for a chunk of code...
--
┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ───── http://www.cowlark.com ─────
│
│ life←{ ↑1 ⍵∨.^3 4=+/,¯1 0 1∘.⊖¯1 0 1∘.⌽⊂⍵ }
│ --- Conway's Game Of Life, in one line of APL