Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy
- From: Mark Hamburg <mark@...>
- Date: 2010年2月17日 09:48:04 -0800
On Feb 17, 2010, at 9:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> By the way, it would also be possible to just use "repeat" which already
> is a reserved word. If its use is restricted to the same places where
> "break" and "return" are allowed, I don't think that there is syntactic
> ambiguity.
Maybe not with a little extra lookahead, but if you see:
if not_ready() then repeat
What are you in the midst of parsing?
Mark
- References:
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Florian Weimer
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Kelley, Brian
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Matthew Wild
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Kelley, Brian
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Matthew Wild
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, David Given
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, David Kastrup
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Mark Hamburg
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, David Kastrup
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Majic
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, David Kastrup
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, David Kastrup