Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available
- From: Andre Carregal <carregal@...>
- Date: 2010年1月12日 15:23:57 -0200
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Roberto Ierusalimschy
<roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>> luaT_typenames[LUA_TLIGHTUSERDATA] and luaT_typenames[LUA_TUSERDATA]
>> should just be the same pointer to allow fast and safe
>> pointer comparision (and save 9 bytes ;).
Nice to see this thread converging, but I still don't get why
strcmp(t1, t2) wouldn't cut it.
The comparison is supposedly used only during error message handling,
no? Is this a valid target for such an optimization?
André
- References:
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available, steve donovan
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available, Nevin Flanagan
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available, Tom N Harris
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available, Tony Finch
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available, Duboucher Thomas
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available, Tom N Harris
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available, Klaus Ripke
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy