Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?
• From: Tim Channon <tc@...>
• Date: 2008年9月14日 02:43:23 +0100

---

Norman Ramsey wrote:
> * With lhf's posix library and another 20 lines of Lua, you need
> never write another sh or perl script again. Lua standalone is
> terrific.
What is missing?
http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/~lhf/ftp/lua/

---

• References:
  • Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?, Matt Campbell
  • Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?, Matt Campbell
  • Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?, Steve Donovan
  • Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?, Norman Ramsey

• Prev by Date: Re: Observer design pattern implementation
• Next by Date: Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?
• Previous by thread: Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?
• Next by thread: sh module (WAS: Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread