Re: typo checks considered mandatory (was Re: Is "scripting" trulyLua's future?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: typo checks considered mandatory (was Re: Is "scripting" trulyLua's future?)
• From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
• Date: 2008年9月12日 17:04:55 -0300

---

> Now I only need a whitelist of allowed globals including built-ins and
> other modules (via reflection), and maybe a small Lua script around
> that for proper filtering.
See http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2006-05/msg00306.html

---

• References:
  • Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?, Matt Campbell
  • Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?, Veli-Pekka Tätilä
  • typo checks considered mandatory (was Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?), Chip Salzenberg
  • Re: typo checks considered mandatory (was Re: Is "scripting" truly Lua's future?), Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: typo checks considered mandatory (was Re: Is "scripting" trulyLua's future?), Veli-Pekka Tätilä

• Prev by Date: Re: typo checks considered mandatory (was Re: Is "scripting" trulyLua's future?)
• Next by Date: Re: LfW
• Previous by thread: Re: typo checks considered mandatory (was Re: Is "scripting" trulyLua's future?)
• Next by thread: Re: typo checks considered mandatory (was Re: Is "scripting" trulyLua's future?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread