Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package]
- From: "Javier Guerra" <javier@...>
- Date: 2008年2月25日 10:16:35 -0500
On 2/25/08, Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@actcom.co.il> wrote:
> IMO, the value of having 'continue' would be much greater than that of
> this scope rule. I'd love to see canceling this rule in favor of adding
> 'continue'. That is, the expression-parameter of 'until' would resolve
> its variables in the scope enclosing the repeat loop.
i'd vote that way too. but how to do the transition? adding warnings
to the compiler??
--
Javier
- References:
- Location of a package, Ignacio Burgueño
- Re: Location of a package, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
- Re: Location of a package, Ignacio Burgueño
- Re: Location of a package, Fabien
- Re: Location of a package, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Location of a package, eugeny gladkih
- upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Shmuel Zeigerman
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Shmuel Zeigerman