Re: CMake and Lua
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: CMake and Lua
- From: "Eric Tetz" <erictetz@...>
- Date: 2008年2月14日 14:08:48 -0800
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Brandon Van Every <bvanevery@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bill said that when CMake first started, they had abundant TCL
> experience and knew they didn't want that.
Classic. :) If familiarity breeds contempt, the language probably has
issues. It seems like you fall in love with good languages the more
you use them.
I worked on a distributed test tool that had chosen TCL as it's
scripting language, simply because the testers already knew it, and I
ended up detesting it (how I felt about it then:
http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/01-09-007).
Anyway, kudos to those guys for making the right call.
- References:
- CMake and Lua, Ken Martin
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, KHMan
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, KHMan
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, E. Wing
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, Eric Tetz
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every