Re: __gc is ignored for tables, isn't it?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: __gc is ignored for tables, isn't it?
• From: roberto@... (Roberto Ierusalimschy)
• Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:20:20 -0300

---

> Do I have this right?
Almost. Light userdata are values, too.
-- Roberto

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: __gc is ignored for tables, isn't it?, Sam Roberts

• References:
  • __gc is ignored for tables, isn't it?, Sam Roberts

• Prev by Date: __gc is ignored for tables, isn't it?
• Next by Date: Re: __gc is ignored for tables, isn't it?
• Previous by thread: __gc is ignored for tables, isn't it?
• Next by thread: Re: __gc is ignored for tables, isn't it?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread