On Tuesday 04 April 2006 3:04 am, Lisa Parratt wrote: > I can tell you for free that I'd be aggravated if any of the class > systems floating around the list were made language standard - to my Amen! for slightly different reasons: to me OO programming is nice; but each project i've had where it was an advantage, sooner or later it has to do some ugly kludges because of the OO model, and it was always a different kind of kludge. that's why i feel that a more basic functional model (like Lua's) is more generic, and if you want OO, after designing your classes, it's trivial to design a OO model to fit them, and not the other way around. IOW: each OO implementation has it's pros and cons, it's better to build just the one you feel better for each specific project, and not impose an arbitrary one as "official" -- Javier
Attachment:
pgppwwDGbo9oW.pgp
Description: PGP signature