Re: test directory
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: test directory
- From: "Victor Boivie" <victor-lua@...>
- Date: 2006年3月23日 19:30:30 +0100
I agree.
It would also be good to add what Adam D Moss is mentioning as an
action point as well:
o "fix or replace them [the samples] to the point where you can be proud
to call them good, simple examples of Lua code."
// V
On 3/23/06, Doug Rogers <rogers@innocon.com> wrote:
> Kein-Hong Man wrote:
>
> > Ideally of course, I would love to have a test suite in
> > the Lua tarball, but I'm okay with any decision.
>
> I vote for:
>
> o Rename 'test' to 'samples' and remove any non-5.1 samples.
> o Add a 'test' target to the build process that returns a non-zero
> exit code and prints:
> 'Regression tests to be added in future release.'
> o Work on a regression test suite on the wiki until a consensus is
> reached.
> Doug
>