Re: OOP and modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: OOP and modules
• From: David Haley <dchaley@...>
• Date: 2006年3月18日 21:59:57 -0800

---

Hi,
On this day of 3-12-2006 6:04 PM, Tomas saw fit to scribe:

 I think there is nothing wrong with your implementation.
 I would like to add that if you want some inheritance, you could
use the second argument of `module()' to achieve an elegant solution.
Let's define a basic object class:
[...]

Lovely, this is exactly what I wanted to do next. Thank you for your reply and sorry for the delay on my part; haven't had a chance to play around with Lua in the past couple of weeks.

Thanks again,
David
--
~David-Haley
http://david.the-haleys.org

---

• References:
  • OOP and modules, David Haley
  • Re: OOP and modules, Tomas

• Prev by Date: Re: Lua x DirectX
• Next by Date: Lua and toLua++: Passing C++ created objects as arguments to Lua functions
• Previous by thread: Re: OOP and modules
• Next by thread: 5.1 doc correction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread