On Thursday 02 March 2006 9:32 am, Alen Ladavac wrote: > In the original Lua, 0 was logically true, because the only logically false > value was nil. That made sense. But since the introduction of the boolean > type in Lua 5, there is a slight mess in what is actually logically false, > causing me to reconsider on the idea of 0 being logically true. i don't feel too strongly about this, but if anythng, i would prefer it to be the other way around: the boolean type should have only one value: true. false would be a synonymous with nil. -- Javier
Attachment:
pgp3YRaOb_Sdt.pgp
Description: PGP signature