Re: Problems with lposix on win32
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Problems with lposix on win32
- From: Chris Marrin <chris@...>
- Date: 2006年1月17日 07:59:12 -0800
Rici Lake wrote:
On 15-Jan-06, at 6:19 PM, D Burgess wrote:
I agree with this.
On 1/16/06, Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de> wrote:
PS: I don't like the name osex. I'd simply put them into os.
I agree with this, too. Loading the extended os package should extend
the existing os package, not create a new one. Truly platform specific
os interfaces could go in separate packages or subpackages (os.macosx)
In looking at the 5.1 code, it seems that loading the os package goes
through a different line of code for registry (luaL_register) than an
external package (ll_module). The code is somewhat different, for
instance, luaL_register does not put an _NAME propertry in the table.
Can I therefore do a 'require "os"' and have something reasonable happen?
--
chris marrin ,"",ドル "As a general rule,don't solve puzzles
chris@marrin.com b` $ that open portals to Hell" ,,.
,.` ,b` ,` , 1$'
,|` mP ,` :$$' ,mm
,b" b" ,` ,mm m$$ ,m ,`P$$
m$` ,b` .` ,mm ,'|$P ,|"1$` ,b$P ,` :1ドル
b$` ,$: :,`` |$$ ,` $$` ,|` ,$,,ドル`"$$ .` :$|
b$| _m$`,:` :1ドル ,` ,$Pm|` ` :$,ドル..;"' |$:
P$b, _;b$$b1ドル" |$$ ,` ,$$" ``' $$
```"```'" `"` `""` ""` ,P`
- References:
- Problems with lposix on win32, Chris Marrin
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Rici Lake
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, D Burgess
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Chris Marrin
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, D Burgess
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Chris Marrin
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, D Burgess
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Edgar Toernig
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Chris Marrin
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Edgar Toernig
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, D Burgess
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Rici Lake