Re: os.setenv()???
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: os.setenv()???
- From: Lisa Parratt <lisa@...>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:47:21 +0000
On 8 Jan 2006, at 17:12, Rici Lake wrote:
Note 1: In fact, it is possible that Lua already includes too much
in the standard distribution. For example, embedding Lua often
requires replacing I/O implementations.
One thing thing that has always puzzled me is that Lua doesn't really
include any optional "standard" libraries. Yes, I know *technically*
they're all pretty much optional, but I don't see that including more
rounded OS functions for the major platforms hurts Lua - if the user
doesn't want them, then they simply don't build them in.
Oh well, not mine to reason why :)
--
Lisa
- References:
- os.setenv()???, Chris Marrin
- Re: os.setenv()???, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: os.setenv()???, David Burgess
- RE: os.setenv()???, Dolan, Ryanne Thomas (UMR-Student)
- Re: os.setenv()???, David Burgess
- Re: os.setenv()???, Diego Nehab
- Re: os.setenv()???, Ryanne Thomas Dolan
- Re: os.setenv()???, David Burgess
- Re: os.setenv()???, Chris Marrin
- Re: os.setenv()???, Rici Lake