Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement
• From: Javier Guerra <javier@...>
• Date: 2005年9月24日 09:45:20 -0500

---

On Saturday 24 September 2005 9:03 am, Chris Marrin wrote:
> For such a simple patch, it seems like a big win.
i'd like to see have continue too.
so far the biggest drawback seem to be the introduction of a new keyword... am 
i wrong?
-- 
Javier

Attachment: pgpBg0yNQoq1t.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Adrian Perez

• References:
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Chris Marrin

• Prev by Date: Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement
• Next by Date: Debuggers for Lua???
• Previous by thread: Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement
• Next by thread: Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread