Re: changes in 'require'
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: changes in 'require'
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: 2005年7月13日 13:38:00 -0300
> I agree its simpler. However, now every successful require pays the
> price of trying all its ancestors, even if none were found. I don't
> know how bad that will be.
First rule of optimization: don't do it :) You are proposing something
that you recognize as more complex just to optimize something you have
no idea whether it needs optimization...
-- Roberto