Re: Package proposal modification proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Package proposal modification proposal
• From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
• Date: 2005年7月01日 17:01:44 -0300

---

> It receives the name of the package being required. For an implicit
> call, it will be "foo.bar" instead of "foo".
That would bring problems. For instance, if "foo" uses
 module(...)
that implicit call would open "foo" inside "foo.bar".
-- Roberto

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Package proposal modification proposal, Diego Nehab

• References:
  • Re: Package proposal modification proposal, Diego Nehab

• Prev by Date: Re: Package proposal modification proposal
• Next by Date: Re: Package proposal modification proposal
• Previous by thread: Re: Package proposal modification proposal
• Next by thread: Re: Package proposal modification proposal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread