Re: Packaging, 2 last concerns
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Packaging, 2 last concerns
- From: Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@...>
- Date: 2004年6月11日 10:43:16 +0300
Without following the whole thread (there's been too much of it.. ;) I
strongly feel module namespaces (s.a. 'socket') should be regarded
read-only. Period. This can either be enforced, or left as a
non-spoken rule, but I see no valid reason for changing things once
they're loaded.
Extending a module (loading in several phases) is one valid situation,
though, but even then the added features should be read-only.
..my 0.01e :)
11.6.2004 kello 03:05, Tomas kirjoitti:
1) The socket namespace is shared between scripts.
Problem: Unsafe. If one script changes it, the others will be
affected.
- References:
- Packaging, 2 last concerns, Diego Nehab
- Re: Packaging, 2 last concerns, Tomas
- Re: Packaging, 2 last concerns, diego
- Re: Packaging, 2 last concerns, Tomas
- Re: Packaging, 2 last concerns, diego
- Re: Packaging, 2 last concerns, Tomas