RE: nil isn't as unique in Lua 4.1
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: nil isn't as unique in Lua 4.1
- From: Enrico Colombini <erix@...>
- Date: 2002年1月15日 09:16:10 +0100
> One could solve the storable nil problem by removing the semantic that
> a["foo"] = nil, deletes the table value, and instead introduce a 'del
> a["foo"]' operation. Then there would be a new existance test, such as
> Python's a.has_key("foo"), or something similar.
If the problem here is only that of 'existing but empty' table entries,
this seems to me a simpler, cleaner solution than having multiple, slightly
different, 'false' values.
(anyway, I am only a C programmer that always felt comfortable with 0 ==
false)
Enrico