Re: HSL and HSLA

• From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
• Date: 2008”N5ŒŽ15“ú 14:57:49 +0200
• To: CSS Style <www-style@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <D920785A-56FA-418F-9406-7EFB8BB85A56@crissov.de>

L. David Baron (2008”N05ŒŽ13“ú):
> On Tuesday 2004”N10ŒŽ19“ú 01:13 +0200, David Latapie wrote:
>> 4.2.1. RGB color values
>> 	4.2.1.1. RGBA color values
>> 4.2.2. 'transparent' color keyword
>> 4.2.3. HSL color values
>> 	4.2.3.1. HSL Examples
>> 	4.2.3.2. HSLA color values
>>
> http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css3-color#issue-13 .
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0405.html> and
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0443.html> 
cover related editorial stuff, but I see them neither mentioned in 
the issue tracker nor incorporated into the Editor's Draft <http:// 
www.w3.org/TR/2008/ED-cvs-member-20080514>.
I tend to agree with Fantasai's suggestion in <http://lists.w3.org/ 
Archives/Public/www-style/2008May/0146.html> to use "basic" and 
"extended" instead of "HTML4" and "SVG", although I still despise the 
X11 color keywords and consider "extended" almost euphemistic.
> I think there is value in having a section for each possible type of
> value. It's a common way of organizing references, and it's helpful
> to implementors.
Yes, but the current structure of sections (and subsections) is not 
optimal at all. Anchors should be left as is, if possible, but this 
is much less important than a coherent order.

Received on Thursday, 15 May 2008 12:58:04 UTC