On 9/28/07, Smith, McCoy <mccoy.smith at intel.com> wrote: > "Preexisting elements of 'its expressive whole' > remain under the BSD license." >> Perhaps it would help those you want to convince if you could point out > where in the BSD license that is stated or implied. Recall that the BSD license doesn't grant the right to sublicense. See also this: http://opensourcelaw.biz/publications/papers/BScott_BSD_The_Dark_Horse_of_Open_Source_070112lowres.pdf He even argues that BSDL is as reciprocal as MS-CL(RL)!!! I'm not that demanding. :-) regards, alexander. -- "PJ points out that lawyers seem to have difficulty understanding the GPL. My main concern with GPLv3 is that - unlike v2 - non-lawyers can't understand it either." -- Anonymous Groklaw Visitor