Quoting Matthew Flaschen (matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu): > As I said, it's OSD-compliant (I think everyone agrees on this). But > that's clearly not the only criteria OSI uses. Is that so? (That's not intended to be rhetorical.) I see nothing on http://www.opensource.org/approval that documents other requirements beyond procedural/review steps to assure OSD-compliance. -- Cheers, "I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate Rick Moen those who do. And, for the people who like country music, rick at linuxmafia.com denigrate means 'put down'." -- Bob Newhart