On 9/10/07, Scott Shattuck <Scott.Shattuck at gmail.com> wrote: >> +10000 >>> I might even go so far as to suggest that only messages specifically > relevant to the following points be acceptable: >> 1) a new license or license revision is being submitted; > 2) a previously submitted license/revision is being withdrawn; > 3) a submitted license is being questioned relative to conformance > with a specific OSI clause How can these be addressed without discussing sub-points, supporting arguments, etc? Wouldn't your proposal provide for approval of licenses with less understanding of what they actually mean? Is that a good thing? Best Wishes, Chris Travers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070913/3144eeb2/attachment.html>