On 9/10/07, Brendan Scott <lists at opensourcelaw.biz> wrote: >>>> Could an alternative list be set up? Agreed. Another list I'm on has a parallel list (called un-) to which threads are > moved (by a moderator) when they become off topic. >> Alternatively, a new list could be set up called license-approve... +1 Clear names and public guidelines avoid a great many problems. Most people probably would assume that a list named "license-discuss" was there for discussing licenses (as its name implies) and of which approval discussions were only a small part of the scope. Unless a list has public and prominant guidelines there *are* no real (official or otherwise) guidelines. If this is a problem it should be fixed. Best Wishes, Chris Travers Brendan >>>>>>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070910/c7845ca5/attachment.html>