Re: [PLUG] Firewall choices for a small software development business
Lee H. Marzke on 3 Jul 2017 21:01:18 -0700
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Firewall choices for a small software development business
- From: "Lee H. Marzke" <lee@marzke.net>
- To: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: Re: [PLUG] Firewall choices for a small software development business
- Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 05:01:11 +0100 (BST)
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: "plug" <plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Thread-index: 2g+wA5rm2ca1OBnLgxD47J197t7tEA==
- Thread-topic: Firewall choices for a small software development business
If your a business and you don't want to fuss with the network I'd always recommend static. I have basically zero issues with pfsense and openVPN with static, and I use it almost daily. There is no guarantee of how often your IP can change , so for a business why gamble?
With one openVPN user my pfsense box (a vm) never goes above 5%cpu so I'd say it can run quite a few users. The hypervisor is on old Dell r710 so only 6 core/ 12 threads, and pfsense gets one thread at most.
--
Lee Marzke. <Lmarzke@4aero.com>
Sent from phone
All, as a post-script to my earlier request: for inbound ssh or VPN for the developers how reliable is that with a dynamic IP address (and a service like DynDNS)? Or should I go for a static IP address? Thanks.
As far as static/dynamic IP goes, I have a "dynamic" IP from Verizon that changes about once a year, so keeping my dynamic hostname updated through
he.net hasn't been a problem.
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug