Re: [PLUG] the current Net Neutrality fad
Art Alexion on 6 Dec 2010 17:54:15 -0800
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] the current Net Neutrality fad
- From: Art Alexion <art.alexion@gmail.com>
- To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: Re: [PLUG] the current Net Neutrality fad
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:54:09 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=j0NfcJNZzWE6XLHIH0UxJtdCKu4ADYbH15Ayz3WQLEs=; b=qldXKyLfLHc2ygJeN5+ksvRP5N/uGcu2TNan9lCwZzQOZU4EY6vEt4Jn0F3oW8Gbsr 6P6HBAKY2XqfEIGPsmSNxd8ruDNADepkvsXIO7pB8HLvzrojRhZTWPn6NmvmgAxsBfdS zjmA/JEqV88ngQUtqV7fVA53SSIsmQsJNwr6w=
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Matt Berlin <arkestra@gmail.com> wrote:
> So - being FOR net-neutrality can be interpreted as being a proponent of the
> illegality of a person/persons regulating the flow of data based upon
> source, destination, and content. Or does the issue revolve more around
> what TelComs can charge for varying types of data transfer?
>
In theory, the former. Compromise inevitably twists the result.
--
artAlexion
sent unsigned from webmail interface
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug