[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Monday 13 September 2004 12:34 pm, Michael Leone wrote: > Not yet, anyway. I've heard lots worse anti-Linux opinions than his. > When he becomes abusive, insulting, etc, then fine - we'll see about > banning him. Dissing Linux is not enuf reason (IMO). I could be > overruled by majority vote, I suppose. How many would that take - we > have somewhere around 400 subscribers, last I heard. has that changed? I agree for now. I'm hoping he polices his actions better and becomes a productive member of this user group like everyone else has been for years. I don't remember a problem like this ever. (I don't mean to offend you Howard, just stating how I see it). > Individual members can easily set their own killfilters, if they wish. Yes, but then the replies to his messages will still get through :( POSSIBLE SOLUTION: Do not reply to a single message he sends (if it is flame-bait). I know its hard to do. But a couple have mentioned it. That should calm him down if he gets no reaction. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug