Re: [PLUG] gpg question

gabriel rosenkoetter on 2003年2月27日 08:50:30 -0500

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• From: gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>
• To: PLUG <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
• Subject: Re: [PLUG] gpg question
• Date: 2003年2月27日 08:42:27 -0500
• Delivery-date: 2003年2月27日 08:50:30 -0500
• Envelope-to: jeff@localhost
• Mail-followup-to: PLUG <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
• Reply-to: plug@lists.phillylinux.org
• Sender: plug-admin@lists.phillylinux.org
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

---

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 08:32:49AM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 08:26:40AM -0500, LeRoy Cressy wrote:
> > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Upgrade. ;)
To clarify, there were *significant* speed improvements made between
1.0.6 and 1.0.7 (which Istr posting about here at the time). Which
is why I was so upset when I found an upgrade to 1.2.1 made things
painfully slow again.
-- 
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

Attachment: pgpAwFDML6SSY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• References:
  • [PLUG] gpg question
    • From: LeRoy Cressy <leroy@lrcressy.com>
  • Re: [PLUG] gpg question
    • From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PLUG] gpg question
• Next by Date: Re: [PLUG] GnuPG 1.2.1 trustdb checks for every pubkey import?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PLUG] gpg question
• Next by thread: [PLUG] how kernel compiling works
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread