[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
I, obviously, kept forgetting to reply to this.... On 07/03, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > points), and I'm unclear on whether we're the "Philadelphia Area > Linux..." or "Philadephia Linux...". "Philadephia Area Linux...." > Also, are we a "Users'" group or a "Users" group? (Slight, but > relevant, semantic difference. The former would be a group for > users, the latter would be a group of users. Not sure how you'd go > about expressing *both*... which is probably why the US Constitution > is specific about each.) I'm less sure of that one. The oldest document I know of that uses the name, and is in any way authoritative is http://www.CJFearnley.com/databus/95cfearnl.dec.txt - Chris Fearnley's December 1995 PACS Databus article, announcing the formation of PLUG. It uses "Philadelphia Area Linux User's Group". But that wasn't one of your options. Is "User's" gramatically correct ? Guess not. In addtion to the 3 mentioned so far, I have also used "Philadelphia Area User Group". Gabriel, maybe you should just pick one, and let us know :) -- http://www.ChaosReigns.com ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug