Problems making jffs2 utils

Wed Apr 9 09:21:22 EDT 2003

On Wed, 9 April 2003 09:09:54 -0400, John Burch wrote:
>> 1. Even to build 'erase' only, one still needs zlib?

No, that shouldn't be the case.
> 2. I can't seem to track down the 'common zlib patch' you refer to. Is
> this a special patch in support of mtd, or a general patch for zlib
> (such that if I get the latest zlib I wouldn't need the patch)?

Dammit! I was stupid, confused or worse and didn't read the work
"utils" in your mail. Others got it right, so I hoped this would go
unnoticed. You didn't have to rub it in.
Forget the common zlib, you only need it for the kernel.
> 3. Is the patch particular to a specific version of zlib?
> 4. Can my target zlib version differ from the host zlib version without
> causing problems?

see above. Sorry about that.
Jörn
-- 
And spam is a useful source of entropy for /dev/random too!
-- Jasmine Strong