Logo

cube archives



cube files

Indexed Cube Lovers Archive

FAQ

GAP files


2x2x2 cube

3x3x3 cube

megaminx

skewb

VIP sphere

Blogs

more

Forum topics

Active forum topics:

New forum topics:

more

User login



Navigation

Who's new

Home »

Twenty-Three Moves Suffice

Submitted by rokicki on Tue, 04/29/2008 - 13:45.
After solving more than 200,000 cosets, we have been able to show that every position of Rubik's cube can be solved in 23 or fewer face turns.

The key contribution for this new result was 7.8 core-years of CPU time contributed by John Welborn and Sony Pictures Imageworks, using idle time on the render farm that was used for pictures such as Spider-Man 3 and Surf's Up.

No distance 21 positions were found in this search, despite solving a total of more than four million billion cube positions.

The same techniques for the proof of twenty-five moves were used, just on many more computers.

To prove 22 would require, using this technique, solving somewhere between 1 and 1.5 million cosets. We are investigating refinements to our techniques to reduce the CPU time required.
» login or register to post comments | previous forum topic | next forum topic

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click 'Save settings' to activate your changes.

Wow great site in the world.S

Submitted by geogre100 on Tue, 11/09/2010 - 06:19.
Wow great site in the world.Such a great site in the world.This site is very helpful for me and others.The key contribution for this new result was 7.8 core-years of CPU time contributed by John Welborn and Sony Pictures Imageworks, using idle time on the render farm that was used for pictures such as Spider-Man 3 and Surf's Up.This is very nice site Take care God bless you



Thanks
geogre
» login or register to post comments

That can be done?

Submitted by HeatherMann on Mon, 01/11/2010 - 01:32.
Never knew that the Rubik's cube can be figured out virtually. Maybe I'll be more adept in playing with it via the computer rather raw logic. Never good with my hands anyway.
» login or register to post comments

Dang it! I congratulate yo

Submitted by plastorgas on Tue, 05/26/2009 - 07:53.
Dang it!

I congratulate you.

I wish i had your brains!

I'd love to understand life the way you do (math) but my brains are just not cut-out for that!

A hug.

---
» login or register to post comments

Thanks.Very interesting data

Submitted by Scoot on Fri, 05/15/2009 - 14:23.
Thanks.Very interesting data have been frankly surprised..
» login or register to post comments

This is a big reduction from

Submitted by jasonsecada on Sun, 05/10/2009 - 08:54.
This is a big reduction from any previous known cosets. What a great discovery.
_______________________
» login or register to post comments

:-)))) Very interesting! Than

Submitted by bfire52 on Sun, 09/14/2008 - 18:26.
:-)))) Very interesting! Thanks!!!
Great site well done!
~
mootzie
» login or register to post comments

Wow! Many congratulations.

Submitted by mdlazreg on Wed, 04/30/2008 - 10:31.
Wow!

Many congratulations.

In a little more than a month you jumped from 25 to 23!. This is absolutely amazing.

I am convinced now the Rubik's diameter will be first found using computational techniques.
» login or register to post comments

Thanks

Submitted by rokicki on Wed, 04/30/2008 - 11:15.
Two things enabled this jump, actually:

1. Scads of CPU time from Imageworks, and

2. A suggestion from Herbert Kociemba on improving the way the coset solver worked. This suggestion simplified some of the code and lifted the "restriction" that the rubik25 paper discusses.

The amount of CPU time required to prove 20 (my ultimate goal) is still absolutely insane; it's on the order of 3500 core-years. So there's still some work to do to reduce this (or we just wait on Moore's Law).

And there's always the chance some position will actually require more than 20 moves; if I find a 21, suddenly the problem is easier.
» login or register to post comments

that's nothing

Submitted by death on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 08:27.
3500 core-years is nothing

did you ever heard of FOLDING@HOME?

» login or register to post comments

Impressive graph

Submitted by rokicki on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 14:10.
Yeah, Folding@home is very impressive. 250K CPUs would crank through this (a final proof of 20) in about five days.
» login or register to post comments

My congratulations Tom! This

Submitted by Herbert Kociemba on Tue, 04/29/2008 - 18:32.
My congratulations Tom! This is a fantastic result. I am at a loss for words.
» login or register to post comments

Browse archives

God's Algorithm Calculations

Poll

www.olympicube.com need cube lovers opinion on which cube to produce first
olympic cube 6a
83%
olympic cube 6b
17%
Total votes: 23

Syndicate

« November 2025
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /