Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of good faith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nemo bis (talk | contribs) at 12:42, 23 February 2009 (cat). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision .Revision as of 12:42, 23 February 2009 by Nemo bis (talk | contribs) (cat)
Essay on editing Wikipedia
This is an essay on the Wikipedia:Assume good faith guideline.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
This page in a nutshell: When involved in a discussion, it is best never to cite WP:AGF .

In heated debates, users often cite Wikipedia's guideline of assuming good faith. However, the very act of citing WP:AGF assumes that the opponent is assuming bad faith. Carbonite's Law tells us, "the more a given user invokes Assume good faith as a defense, the lower the probability that said user was acting in good faith." It is in combining Carbonite's law with AGF that we produce AAGF: Assume the assumption of good faith, which simply states:

"When involved in a discussion, it is best never to cite WP:AGF."

In reality, this is simply an extension of AGF, which allows for the possibility that one can incorrectly judge another's intentions or assumptions. AAGF acknowledges that the act of citing AGF requires one to assume the assumption of bad faith, and is thus open to its own form of abuse—an abuse which Carbonite's law reveals as an eventuality. While AGF should still be cited for especially egregious situations, or in debate among new users, it should be avoided whenever possible.

The first rule of WP:AGF: Don't talk about WP:AGF.

See also

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /