Realizing the impacts of a 1.5 °C warmer world

1. Report on the structured expert dialogue on the 2013–2015 review FCCC/SB/2015/INF.1 (UNFCCC, 2015).

2. Tschakert, P. 1. 5 °C or 2 °C: a conduit's view from the science-policy interface at COP20 in Lima, Peru. Climate Change Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40665-015-0010-z (2015).

3. New, M. et al. Four degrees and beyond: the potential for a global temperature increase of four degrees and its implications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 369, 6–19 (2011).

   Article Google Scholar

4. Fischer, E. & Knutti, R. Anthropogenic contributions to global occurrence of heavy-precipitation and high-temperature extremes. Nature Clim. Change 5, 560–564 (2015).

   Article Google Scholar

5. Schleussner, C. F. et al. Differential climate impacts for policy relevant limits to global warming: the case of 1.5 and 2 °C. Earth Syst. Dynam. 6, 2447–2505 (2015).

   Article Google Scholar

6. Rogelj, J. & Knutti, R. Geoscience after Paris. Nature Geosci. 9, 187–189 (2016).

   Article CAS Google Scholar

7. Peters, G. The best available science to inform 1.5 °C policy choices. Nature Clim Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3000 (2016).

8. Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

   Google Scholar

9. Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 1095–1107 (2009)

   Article Google Scholar

10. Otto, F. E., Frame, D. J., Otto, A. & Allen, M. R. Embracing uncertainty in climate change policy. Nature Clim. Change 5, 917–920 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

11. Hulme, M. 1. 5 °C and climate change after the Paris Agreement. Nature Clim. Change 6, 222–234 (2016).

    Article Google Scholar

12. Pendergrass, A. G. et al. Does extreme precipitation intensity depend on the emissions scenario? Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8767–8774 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

13. Ishizaki, Y. et al. Dependence of precipitation scaling patterns on emissions scenarios for representative concentration pathways. J. Clim. 26, 8868–8879 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

14. Shiogama, H. et al. Emission scenario dependencies in climate change assessments of the hydrological cycle. Climatic Change 99, 321–329 (2010).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

15. Tebaldi, C. & Arblaster, J. Pattern scaling: its strengths and limitations, and an update on the latest model simulations. Climatic Change 122, 459–471 (2014).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

16. Pal, J. S. & Eltahir, E. Future temperature in southwest Asia projected to exceed a threshold for human adaptability. Nature Clim. Change 6, 197–200 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

17. Allen, M. Liability for climate change. Nature 421, 891–892 (2003).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

18. Gasser, T. et al. Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C. Nature commun. 6, 7958 (2015).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

19. James, R. et al. Characterizing loss and damage from climate change. Nature Clim. Change 4, 938–939 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

Download references