The Universe of Discourse


Mark Dominus (陶敏修)
mjd@pobox.com


About me

RSS Atom

12 recent entries

My new git utility `what-changed-twice` needs a new name
Mystery of the quincunx's missing quincunx
The fivefold symmetry of the quince
A descriptive theory of seasons in the Mid-Atlantic
Claude and I write a utility program
A puzzle about balancing test tubes in a centrifuge
Proof by insufficient information
Willie Singletary will you please go now?
How our toy octopuses got revenge on a Philadelphia traffic court judge
Does someone really have to do the dirty jobs?
The mathematical past is a foreign country
Baseball on the Moon

Archive:

2025: JF M A MJ
JAS
2024: JF M A M J
J ASOND
2023: JF M A M J
J A S O N D
2022: J F M A M J
JAS O N D
2021: J F M AMJ
J A S O N D
2020: J F M A M J
J A S O N D
2019: JFM A M J
J A S O N D
2018: J F M A M J
J A S O N D
2017: J F M A M J
J A S O N D
2016: JF M A M J
JASON D
2015: JFM A M J
J A S O N D
2014: J F M AMJ
JASON D
2013: JFMAMJ
JAS OND
2012: J F MAMJ
JASOND
2011: JFMAM J
JASOND
2010: JFMAMJ
JA S O ND
2009: J F MAM J
JASOND
2008: J F M A M J
JAS O ND
2007: J F M A M J
J A S O N D
2006: J F M A M J
JAS O N D
2005: O N D


Subtopics:

Book 50
Tech 49
Oops 30
Unix 27
Law 22
Perl 17
Brain 15
Food 15

Higher-Order Perl Blosxom

Comments disabled


2008年2月07日

Trivial theorems
Mathematical folklore contains a story about how Acta Quandalia published a paper proving that all partially uniform k-quandles had the Cosell property, and then a few months later published another paper proving that no partially uniform k-quandles had the Cosell property. And in fact, goes the story, both theorems were quite true, which put a sudden end to the investigation of partially uniform k-quandles.

Except of course it wasn't Acta Quandalia (which would never commit such a silly error) and it didn't concern k-quandles; it was some unspecified journal, and it concerned some property of some sort of topological space, and that was the end of the investigation of those topological spaces.

This would not qualify as a major screwup under my definition in the original article, since the theorems are true, but it certainly would have been rather embarrassing. Journals are not supposed to publish papers about the properties of the empty set.

Hmm, there's a thought. How about a Journal of the Properties of the Empty Set? The editors would never be at a loss for material. And the cover almost designs itself.

Handsome, isn't it? I See A Great Need!

Ahem. Anyway, if the folklore in question is true, I suppose the mathematicians involved might have felt proud rather than ashamed, since they could now boast of having completely solved the problem of partially uniform k-quandles. But on the other hand, suppose you had been granted a doctorate on the strength of your thesis on the properties of objects from some class which was subsequently shown to be empty. Wouldn't you feel at least a bit like a fraud?

Is this story true? Are there any examples? Please help me, gentle readers.

[ Addendum 20210828: Mathematician [Carl Ludig Siegel once wrote in a letter](http://docmadhattan.fieldofscience.com/2019/12/carl-ludwig-siegel-number-thoery-pig.html) "I am afraid that mathematics will perish before the end of this century if the present trend for senseless abstraction — as I call it: theory of the empty set — cannot be blocked up." ]


[Other articles in category /math] permanent link


AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /