Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

Computer Science> Computer Science and Game Theory

arXiv:2007.10857 (cs)
[Submitted on 21 Jul 2020]

Title:Smoothed Complexity of 2-player Nash Equilibria

View PDF
Abstract:We prove that computing a Nash equilibrium of a two-player ($n \times n$) game with payoffs in $[-1,1]$ is PPAD-hard (under randomized reductions) even in the smoothed analysis setting, smoothing with noise of constant magnitude. This gives a strong negative answer to conjectures of Spielman and Teng [ST06] and Cheng, Deng, and Teng [CDT09].
In contrast to prior work proving PPAD-hardness after smoothing by noise of magnitude 1ドル/\operatorname{poly}(n)$ [CDT09], our smoothed complexity result is not proved via hardness of approximation for Nash equilibria. This is by necessity, since Nash equilibria can be approximated to constant error in quasi-polynomial time [LMM03]. Our results therefore separate smoothed complexity and hardness of approximation for Nash equilibria in two-player games.
The key ingredient in our reduction is the use of a random zero-sum game as a gadget to produce two-player games which remain hard even after smoothing. Our analysis crucially shows that all Nash equilibria of random zero-sum games are far from pure (with high probability), and that this remains true even after smoothing.
Comments: 21 pages, 1 figure; FOCS 2020
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
Cite as: arXiv:2007.10857 [cs.GT]
(or arXiv:2007.10857v1 [cs.GT] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.10857

Submission history

From: Joshua Brakensiek [view email]
[v1] 2020年7月21日 14:33:43 UTC (23 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
Current browse context:
cs.GT
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /